Constitutionality Of Capital City Relocation In Living Constitution Perspective: Analysis Of Constitutional Court Decision Number 34/Puu-Xx/2022 And Its Implications For Sustainable Development

Main Article Content

exsyelhendy basuki
Windya Nopryanti
Khoirul Abdul Aziz
Ilham Muhammad Zain
Hezron Sabar Rotua Tinambunan
Febrian Indar Surya Kusuma

Abstract

The relocation of Indonesia's capital city to Ibu Kota Nusantara through Law Number 3 of 2022 triggered the largest wave of judicial review in Indonesian constitutional history. This article analyzes the constitutionality of this policy through the lens of living constitution theory, focusing on the ratio decidendi of Constitutional Court Decision Number 34/PUU-XX/2022. Using normative legal research with statutory, case and conceptual approaches, it finds that the Court employed judicial restraint via the open legal policy doctrine, yet applied the meaningful participation parameter inconsistently compared to Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. The ruling carries ambivalent implications for SDG 11 and SDG 16.

Article Details

How to Cite
Basuki, E. H., Nopryanti, W., Aziz, K. A., Zain, I. M., Tinambunan, H. S. R., & Kusuma, F. I. S. (2026). Constitutionality Of Capital City Relocation In Living Constitution Perspective: Analysis Of Constitutional Court Decision Number 34/Puu-Xx/2022 And Its Implications For Sustainable Development. Lex Generalis Law Journal, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v7i3.3402
Section
Articles